Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality process skill: fully executable guidance with exact commands, complete code, and two verified one-level-deep template references, driven by a well-sequenced workflow with explicit validation and failure-triage feedback loops. The only weakness is minor verbosity in a few rationale-heavy passages (the Coverage Check justification and the injection-policy paragraph) that could be tightened.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with Hilla/AUP-specific guidance Claude would not know ("spy on the generated endpoint module... that is the supported seam", "No Mockito, no @Transactional") and never explains general concepts, but a few passages argue rather than instruct and could be trimmed — e.g. the closing "Running the audit here would triple it — once after implementation, once after tests, once in /coverage-check" rationale and the multi-sentence injection-policy paragraph. This sits above 'minor instances of over-explanation' being absent but below 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Everything is executable: the exact dev-dependency install command, a complete vitest.config.ts, the exact UseCase.java annotation source, concrete run commands ("npx vitest -t 'UC-XXX'", "npm test -- --run", "mvn test -Dtest=UC<id>*"), and copy-paste-ready TSX/Java test patterns, backed by two full template suites in references/. Common cases are covered with specific examples. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 12-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation ("Run both suites... on a failure, decide first whether the test or the code is wrong") and a real feedback loop: the 'When a Test Fails' section prescribes diagnosing test mechanics vs. specification disagreement before changing anything, and step 10 gives concrete failure-triage checks. Guardrails (no weakening assertions, no .skip/@Disabled) make the recovery path unambiguous. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A Templates section clearly signals both reference files (references/UC001ManagePersonsViewTest.tsx.md and references/UC001ManagePersonsServiceTest.java.md, both verified real and one level deep — they contain only code, no nested references), the full test suites are appropriately deferred to them while inline snippets stay minimal, and the body's sections are well-organized and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |