Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable body with concrete commands, quality-verification checkpoints, and fallback handling. Its only weaknesses are minor: a couple of trimmable concept-explanation sentences and inline template content that could be offloaded to reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient overall — commands, thresholds, and examples are dense and useful — with only minor trimmable padding such as 'Skills are modular packages that extend agent capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, and tools.' Fits anchor 4; not anchor 3 since unnecessary explanation is limited to a couple of sentences, not sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: copy-paste commands ('npx skills find [query]', 'npx skills add <owner/repo@skill> -g -y') with flag explanations, worked search examples ('react performance', 'pr review', 'changelog'), concrete quality thresholds (1K+ installs, <100 stars), and ready-to-use response templates. Matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-step workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint (Step 4: 'Do not recommend a skill based solely on search results' with specific criteria) and a fallback error path ('When No Skills Are Found'). No destructive or batch operations, so no cap applies. Matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body references none; the single file is well-sectioned with clear headers. At ~140 lines, content like the example-response templates and the category table could plausibly live in reference files — minor organization gaps matching anchor 4 rather than the fully split structure of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |