Content
47%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably lean and free of padding, and its single-section short form is appropriate for a principle/reminder skill. However, it is composed almost entirely of abstract directives with no concrete examples or procedures, and it depends on four undefined external frameworks (OODA, project blackboard, verification rules, combination attacks) that have no accompanying reference files, so Claude cannot actually execute the guidance without outside context.
Suggestions
Add one concrete mini-example per directive (e.g. what 'search everything (multi-channel)' looks like: cert transparency logs, GitHub dorks, app-store metadata, Shodan — or what an entry on the 'blackboard Fact' record should contain) to lift actionability.
Either define or link the referenced frameworks (OODA, 项目黑板Fact, 验证铁律, 组合拳) — create a references/ file for each, or drop the names and state the operative rule inline — so the guidance is self-contained.
Order the directives into a repeatable loop (e.g. enumerate surfaces → verify each finding → chain verified facts → record results → switch route when blocked) so the body conveys a usable sequence rather than a flat principle list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~10 lines with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every directive line is compact. It falls short of anchor 5 because the closing blockquote ("这条链可能全世界只有你这一个目标适用...这就是跳出固有框架的真正含义") is motivational commentary rather than instruction, so not every token earns its place; it is clearly above anchor 3, which requires unnecessary explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body is entirely principle statements — "搜索一切(多渠道)" (search everything, multi-channel), "被拦换路" (switch routes when blocked), "不达不休" (persist until done) — with no concrete commands, examples, or procedures, and it leans on undefined external frameworks ("OODA/项目黑板Fact/验证铁律/组合拳") with no pointers to them. This matches anchor 2 ('high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute') better than anchor 1 only because the directives do tell Claude what behavior to adopt. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequence or structure to follow: the directives are a flat list of principles inside a code block, and the referenced frameworks (OODA loop, project blackboard, verification rules, combination attacks) are never sequenced or linked. The simple-skill exception does not fully apply because the single action (apply the unlimited-scope principle) is ambiguous without those undefined framework definitions; this is above anchor 1 only because the principles themselves are individually coherent. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well under 50 lines with a single section header and no need for external reference files, so the short inline body is appropriately placed — matching the guidelines' simple-skill exception. It falls short of anchor 5 because the body names four external concepts (OODA, 项目黑板Fact, 验证铁律, 组合拳) that are neither defined here nor linked to any bundle file (references/ does not exist), leaving those references unresolved. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |