Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean orchestration skill body: terse, actionable, well-sectioned, with a clean Read-by-Need disclosure structure backed by real reference files. The only gaps are a minimal in-body code example set and rule-style rather than numbered-checkpoint workflow framing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and lean: every line is prescriptive guidance with specific method names and no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what concurrency or a graph is), assuming competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, method-level guidance abounds ('flow.create_execution(auto_close=False)', 'await execution.async_close()', 'emit_nowait(...)', 'pause_for(..., resume_to=...)') plus a copy-paste API block, but the in-body code is minimal and most runnable examples are delegated to references rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Topology First' provides a clear pre-implementation mapping sequence and verification language appears ('validation barrier', 'verify external refs, versions, leases, and fence tokens before readiness'), but it is presented as topical rules rather than a strict numbered workflow with explicit validate->fix->retry checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A 'Read by Need' section cleanly signals one-level-deep references with topic labels (overview, recovery, runtime-intervention, stream-bridge, devtools-graph), all of which exist in the bundle, while the body stays an overview that points to detail rather than inlining it. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |