Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean routing/ownership overview that assumes Claude's competence and uses textbook progressive disclosure to push detail into verified reference files, with concrete named entities making the guidance actionable despite being instruction-only.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and information-rich with no padding: it never explains concepts Claude already knows and every line (ownership rules, routing, anti-patterns) earns its place, matching anchor 5's 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete actionable guidance via named owners, files, and APIs ('route through `agently-design`', 'read `references/task-dag.md`', '`.input(...)`', '`.info(...)`', '`.output(...)`'), fitting anchor 4; it stops short of anchor 5 only because, as an instruction-only skill, it offers no copy-paste executable code covering common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 'Workflow' section (steps 1-6) sequences the design process clearly and includes an escalation checkpoint ('Report a framework gap when no native owner can carry a required invariant'), matching anchor 4; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is design/routing work, and it lacks the explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop that would lift it to anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 'Read by Need' section maps each need to a verified one-level-deep reference file (references/project-framework.md, context-and-skills.md, task-dag.md, model-quality-validation.md) and the full-stack-reference asset, with well-organized sections throughout, matching anchor 5's clear overview with well-signaled one-level references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |