CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

equity-risk-reviewer

Use for portfolio-facing stock risk briefs that separate market facts, interpretation, and non-investment-advice boundaries.

72

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-organized instruction set that gives Claude exactly what it needs to produce a compliant risk brief with no wasted tokens. It exemplifies the concise, actionable, simple-skill pattern the rubric rewards.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — a one-line trigger plus six terse requirement bullets — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Although code-free, the guidance is concrete and directive ('Separate observed market data from interpretation', 'Mark stale, example, or non-live data boundaries explicitly', 'Do not invent prices, filings, or news'), so per the instruction-only scoring note its absence of code is not penalized and the guidance is fully actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill (produce a risk brief) whose single action is unambiguous and well-organized as a checklist; the simple-skills note allows a 3 here, and no destructive/batch operation is present that would require validation checkpoints.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and uses clear sections (# title, ## Requirements); per the under-50-lines note, well-organized sections alone earn a 3, and no bundle files exist to create nested-reference problems.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, third-person, and cleanly states both its purpose and an explicit trigger, with a distinctive niche. Its main weakness is trigger-term coverage and action specificity, which keep it just below the top tier on those two dimensions.

Suggestions

Add a broader set of natural trigger terms (e.g., 'equity research', 'risk assessment', 'investment risk brief') so users with varied phrasing land on the skill.

Enumerate a couple more concrete capabilities (e.g., 'compare upside vs. downside, flag stale data, surface portfolio-fit gaps') to lift specificity from domain-naming to a concrete action list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('stock risk briefs') and some actions ('separate market facts, interpretation, and non-investment-advice boundaries'), but stops short of listing multiple concrete capabilities, matching the 'Names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive' anchor rather than the level-3 list of specific actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

The 'Use for portfolio-facing stock risk briefs…' clause provides explicit trigger guidance (equivalent to 'Use when…') and the remainder states what the skill does, satisfying both 'what' and 'when'; it is not level 2 because the when-trigger is explicit rather than merely implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes relevant terms a user might say ('portfolio-facing stock risk briefs'), but misses common natural variations such as 'equity research', 'risk assessment', or 'investment risk', fitting the 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'portfolio-facing stock risk briefs' with the non-investment-advice boundary framing carves a clear niche unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, matching the 'Clear niche with distinct triggers; unlikely to conflict' anchor.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
AgentEra/Agently
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.