CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

equity-risk-reviewer

Use for portfolio-facing stock risk briefs that separate market facts, interpretation, and non-investment-advice boundaries.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An efficient, well-organized instruction skill that gives clear, specific requirements for a stock risk brief. Adding a brief output template or example brief would lift actionability and workflow clarity from strong to exemplary.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient — six short directive bullets with no concept over-explanation or padding; every token earns its place and it assumes Claude's competence.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific directives ('Compare upside signals, downside risks, and watchpoints'; 'Mark stale, example, or non-live data boundaries explicitly') are actionable for an instruction-only skill. Not a 5 because no example brief or output template illustrates the expected structure.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-purpose skill the action (produce a risk brief) is reasonably unambiguous from the requirements list. Not a 5 because the requirements are a flat unsequenced list with no output template or explicit validation checkpoint.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into a clear title, intro, and a 'Requirements' bulleted section — meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, domain-specific description that clearly states both its trigger and its framing purpose. The 'when' could be expanded into multiple trigger variations and a few natural synonyms (equity, investment risk) are missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific framing actions — 'separate market facts, interpretation, and non-investment-advice boundaries' — for a named domain, with minor gaps (no output-format coverage). Not a 3 because it names more than 1-2 concrete actions; not a 5 because coverage is not comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

The fused clause 'Use for portfolio-facing stock risk briefs that separate...' answers both when (the trigger) and what (the framing actions). Not a 5 because the 'when' is a single trigger phrase rather than elaborated variations ('when the user mentions...').

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains natural terms a user would say — 'portfolio-facing', 'stock', 'risk briefs', 'market facts' — with good coverage. Not a 5 because common synonyms like 'equity', 'investment risk', or 'risk analysis' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche — equity/stock portfolio risk briefs with explicit non-investment-advice boundaries — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
AgentEra/Agently
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.