interview-question-preparer

Prepare an evidence-backed blog/media interview preparation brief for a specified person by researching public context, reflecting on information sufficiency, and writing the final Markdown deliverable.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, concise, instruction-only skill with concrete guidance, a clear sequenced workflow, and explicit validation/feedback checkpoints. It appropriately uses clear sections rather than external references for this single-purpose task.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padding; each section (Workflow, Output Requirements, Boundaries) earns its place with direct guidance.	3 / 3
Actionability	Though it is an instruction-only skill with no code, the guidance is concrete and specific: a numbered workflow with exact steps (search broadly then browse, keep compact notes, write to the requested path, read back, include a validation checklist) and an enumerated deliverable spec, satisfying the actionable-instruction analog of copy-paste-ready guidance.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 7-step sequence is clearly ordered and includes explicit validation checkpoints — step 4's sufficiency reflection (whether another search/browse is needed) and step 7's read-back plus validation checklist — matching the anchor for a clear sequence with feedback loops and checklists.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and none are needed for this single-purpose skill; the body is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Workflow, Output Requirements, Boundaries), which the rubric allows to score 3 for simple, self-contained skills with well-organized sections.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, naming concrete actions and a clear deliverable niche. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit "Use when" trigger clause and narrower natural-keyword coverage, which caps completeness and trigger quality below the top level.

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when" clause naming the trigger, e.g. "Use when preparing a blog or media interview brief for a person, author, founder, or project owner."

Broaden natural trigger terms to include phrasings users actually say, such as "interview questions," "interview prep," or "media prep."

Clarify the trigger boundary by noting it is for published articles/long-form conversations, not hiring or candidate evaluation.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description lists multiple concrete actions — "researching public context," "reflecting on information sufficiency," and "writing the final Markdown deliverable" — matching the anchor for listing several specific actions, rather than merely naming a domain.	3 / 3
Completeness	It clearly answers "what" (an evidence-backed interview brief via research, reflection, and writing) but lacks any explicit "when to use this" trigger clause; the "when" is only implied, and the rubric caps completeness at 2 when such a clause is missing.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	It includes relevant natural terms like "blog/media interview" and "interview preparation brief," but misses common variations a user might say (e.g., "interview questions," "media prep") and has no explicit "Use when" trigger phrasing, so it is not the full coverage of a 3.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	"blog/media interview preparation brief" for a published article is a clear, narrow niche unlikely to overlap with or trigger for unrelated skills, matching the distinct-triggers anchor rather than the generic-overlap anchors at 1–2.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: AgentEra/Agently
Path: examples/agent_task/skills/interview-question-preparer/SKILL.md
Commit: 1317da6

Reviewed: about 6 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.