Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a concise, well-structured workflow with explicit output requirements and a validation checkpoint. Its main weakness is actionability: it gives procedural direction but no executable examples or templates.
Suggestions
Add a compact deliverable template or a 1-2 example interview-question group to make the output format copy-paste ready.
Include an explicit 'if the read-back validation fails, fix and re-validate' loop to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; a few phrasings could be trimmed but it is mostly efficient. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in shape (numbered workflow, explicit output checklist, 'at least eight questions') but contains no executable code or copy-paste commands; it is instruction-only with mostly actionable but incomplete specifics. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence is present with an explicit read-back validation checkpoint and a post-write validation checklist; minor gaps (no explicit retry/fix loop) keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, well-organized into clear sections; per the simple-skill exception it qualifies for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |