CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

interview-question-preparer

Prepare an evidence-backed blog/media interview preparation brief for a specified person by researching public context, reflecting on information sufficiency, and writing the final Markdown deliverable.

60

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./examples/agent_task/skills/interview-question-preparer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a concise, well-structured workflow with explicit output requirements and a validation checkpoint. Its main weakness is actionability: it gives procedural direction but no executable examples or templates.

Suggestions

Add a compact deliverable template or a 1-2 example interview-question group to make the output format copy-paste ready.

Include an explicit 'if the read-back validation fails, fix and re-validate' loop to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; a few phrasings could be trimmed but it is mostly efficient.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete in shape (numbered workflow, explicit output checklist, 'at least eight questions') but contains no executable code or copy-paste commands; it is instruction-only with mostly actionable but incomplete specifics.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step sequence is present with an explicit read-back validation checkpoint and a post-write validation checklist; minor gaps (no explicit retry/fix loop) keep it just below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, well-organized into clear sections; per the simple-skill exception it qualifies for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill produces but omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which limits completeness. It is specific and reasonably distinctive.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases, e.g. 'Use when preparing a blog or media interview brief for a person, founder, or project owner.'

Include a few natural synonyms ('interview questions', 'interview prep', 'press/media interview') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (interview prep) and several concrete actions ('researching public context', 'reflecting on information sufficiency', 'writing the final Markdown deliverable'), which is good coverage with minor gaps versus the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance for when Claude should use it, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ('blog/media interview', 'interview preparation brief') with good coverage, though it lacks common synonyms/variations and a file-format-style trigger.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'evidence-backed blog/media interview preparation brief' niche is fairly distinct and would rarely trigger for the wrong skill, with only minor overlap risk against generic research skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
AgentEra/Agently
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.