Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill that gives specific, actionable requirements without padding. Its main gap is the absence of a concrete output example and an explicit sequencing of how to assemble the memo.
Suggestions
Add a short example decision table or a one-line sample memo skeleton to make the expected output format concrete.
Order the Requirements bullets into a suggested assembly sequence (e.g., decision -> evidence -> opportunity/risk -> experiments -> assumptions) so the workflow is explicit.
Optionally add a brief self-check step (e.g., 'Confirm the memo states the decision and separates CRM from competitive evidence before finalizing').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every bullet earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific directives ('State the decision', 'Use CRM/pipeline evidence and competitive evidence separately', 'Prefer a small decision table or short bullets'), but lacks a sample output or decision-table example to fully cover common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The deliverable is unambiguous with a clear requirements checklist, but the requirements are not sequenced into an explicit assembly workflow; no destructive/batch cap applies so this stays above 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references; well-organized with a header and a Requirements section, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |