Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body: a concrete discover->resolve->create->test loop with explicit validation checkpoints and an error-recovery feedback loop, plus executable call examples. The only notable weakness is the dated availability blockquote, which dents conciseness per the time-sensitive-content guideline.
Suggestions
Move the 'Availability (2026-06-27)' note (date + SDK-not-yet-declared status) into a clearly marked 'Status / not yet available' or deprecated-style section so the dated, version-specific detail does not penalize conciseness.
Once the SDK declares find_capabilities as a callable tool, prune the workaround endpoints (POST /tools/discover, POST /tools/call) or relocate them to a fallback section to keep the main flow lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and operational (bullet glossaries, a concrete loop, a jsonc call), but the 'Availability (2026-06-27)' blockquote carries time-sensitive date/version detail not housed in a deprecated/old-patterns section, which the guidelines penalize; not score 3 because of that dated content, not score 1 because it never pads with concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance — a real find_capabilities({use_cases}) payload plus concrete HTTP endpoints ('POST /tools/discover' with {"use_cases":[...]}, 'POST /tools/connections/' with a body) and specific field references; not score 2 because it is copy-paste ready, not pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences a clear 'discover -> resolve-connections -> create -> test' loop with numbered steps, explicit checkpoints ('re-run find_capabilities... to confirm ready', 'Always check connection.state before assuming a tool will run'), and a recovery feedback loop ('If a tool call fails on a missing connection, return to step 3'); not score 2 because validation checkpoints and the error loop are explicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the skill is appropriately self-contained; it is well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested/deep references and no monolithic wall of text; not score 2 because nothing here clearly belongs in a separate file — the dense material is integral to the operational loop. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |