Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a lean, well-structured instruction-only skill: an unambiguous five-step workflow with built-in sourcing discipline and epistemic hygiene (facts vs. interpretations, known vs. unknown). The only notable gap is that the final assessment's expected format is left implicit, which keeps actionability and workflow clarity at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is five terse directive lines ("Prefer the company's official website for product and contact facts", "Record facts with source URLs") with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place, matching the 'Lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill, the guidance is concrete and directive ("Separate facts from uncertain interpretations", "Explain which criteria match, which do not, and which remain unknown"), with only a minor gap: "Return a short assessment" leaves the deliverable's structure unspecified. Not a 3 because no key details are missing beyond the output format; not a 5 because no template or example of the assessment is given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence runs from reading criteria through sourced fact-gathering to the final assessment, with epistemic checkpoints (source URLs, fact/interpretation separation, matched/unmatched/unknown triage). Not a 5 because there is no explicit verify-and-retry feedback loop; the task is non-destructive, so no validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and the single coherent numbered list under one heading is well-organized; per the scoring notes, simple skills in this shape can score 5 without external file references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |