CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

triage-findings

Coordinate findings work with the user, decide whether scan, test, or sync should run, and turn the current findings set into a ready plan. Accept optional `path` and GitHub PR `url`; default to `path=infer`. Confirm effective variables before starting.

58

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agents/skills/triage-findings/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Triage Findings

Read these shared references when needed:

  • ../shared/references/findings.schema.md
  • ../shared/references/findings.lifecycle.md

Role

Triage is the planning and clarification layer across findings work.

  • Decide whether the next step is scan-codebase, test-codebase, sync-findings, or resolve-findings.
  • Read the active findings record and current code or docs as needed.
  • Ask the next concrete follow-up questions instead of leaving ambiguity buried in statuses.

URL Input

Accept an optional GitHub PR url from the prompt.

  • If a PR URL is provided, use it when triage needs GitHub context or should invoke sync-findings.
  • If no URL is provided, stay local-only unless the user adds remote context.

Default:

  • url=local-only

Path Input

Accept an optional path from the prompt.

  • If path is provided, use it as the local design or findings folder.
  • If path is omitted, infer it from the branch, subsystem, or matching docs and state the inferred value before starting.

Default:

  • path=infer

Workflow

  1. Establish triage scope. Confirm the effective variables first:

    • path
    • url
    • branch, PR URL if present, current findings file, and any focus areas
  2. Load the active findings record. Use path/findings.md.

  3. Decide what is missing. Determine whether the next need is:

    • more review via scan-codebase
    • more validation via test-codebase
    • findings or GitHub reconciliation via sync-findings
    • direct implementation via resolve-findings
  4. Surface decisions and blockers. Present open questions, competing fix paths, policy ambiguity, and missing confirmations clearly. If the user has already started answering, ask the next concrete follow-up questions in the same turn.

  5. Produce a ready plan. End triage with a concrete next step, not a vague status-only handoff.

Rules

  • Triage is discussion and planning, not silent execution by default.
  • Do not hide ambiguity behind open or needs-user-decision.
  • Do not force a CR or QA label when the user wants one shared findings workflow.
Repository
Agenta-AI/agenta
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.