Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and a well-sequenced, validation-gated workflow, but it is padded with rationale and inline dated war-stories, and two of its three external references are absent from the bundle with no clean navigation block.
Suggestions
Move the dated incident notes (2026-07-26, 2026-07-28) and the "为什么…" rationale blocks into a dedicated 'old patterns / lessons learned' or reference file so the main flow stays lean and the time-sensitive context doesn't inflate the working instructions.
Add a short navigation block listing each external reference with its purpose, and confirm business-workflow-contract.md and runtime-and-product-contract.md are actually shipped in the bundle — otherwise inline the minimum needed contract steps so the skill is self-contained.
Tighten or relocate the 修字 war-story detail (e.g. the 16-写法 / 39-词 anecdote) into semantic-deletion.md so the instructional steps in the main body read as compact directives.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept teaching) and leads with commands, but is padded with rationale blocks ("为什么不切…", "为什么必须在判断之前…") and inline dated incident notes (2026-07-26, 2026-07-28) not isolated in a deprecated section, so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with concrete flags (e.g. `node "$VC" project create "$jobDir" --video … --transcript … --json`) plus a complete JSON candidate schema, leaving no guesswork. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clearly sequenced sections 0–5 with explicit validation checkpoints ("只有脚本确认服务 healthy=true…才继续", readback projectId/revision matching, readBackVerified) and a recovery section ("恢复与失败") giving fix→retry feedback loops for risky batch/destructive operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It has numbered section structure and points to one real reference (references/semantic-deletion.md, present), but two referenced files (../../references/business-workflow-contract.md, ../../references/runtime-and-product-contract.md) are missing from the bundle and references are scattered inline rather than in a clearly signaled navigation block, with detail that could live separately kept inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |