Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured orchestration skill: concise, clearly sequenced, with sensible safety gates (draft-only account changes, mutation gate, validated JSON bundle) and appropriate deferral of detail to reference files. The main gaps are unnamed shared references and the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Name or link the shared measurement, benchmark, creative, automation, policy, and scoring reference files (or state where they are listed) so navigation does not depend solely on amazon-audit.md.
Add a brief feedback loop for validation failures, e.g., what to do when findings fail schema validation or when the mutation gate rejects a proposed change.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~30 lines) with three tight sections (Procedure, Boundaries, Output) and zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — e.g., it lists inputs to collect ("objective, conversion definition, account and campaign age, geography, date window, timezone, currency, spend, targets") without elaborating. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps are mostly executable: it names the exact file to read ("ads/references/amazon-audit.md") with path-resolution instructions, an explicit input checklist, and a defined output contract ("Return schema-valid findings to the conductor"). It falls short of fully concrete guidance because the shared measurement/benchmark/creative/automation/policy/scoring references are referred to generically without names or links, and control specifics are entirely deferred. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step procedure is clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints for risky operations: "Keep every account change as a draft until the main mutation gate passes", "Return schema-valid findings", and "Render a platform report only from the validated JSON run bundle". However, no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop is described, keeping it below the anchor-5 example. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body keeps itself a lean overview that defers detail to a well-signaled reference ("Read `ads/references/amazon-audit.md`" with resolution guidance), which is good structure. It stops short of a 5 because the shared reference files are referenced collectively ("the relevant shared measurement, benchmark, creative, automation, policy, and scoring references") rather than individually named or linked, and the referenced files are not part of this bundle so navigation cannot be verified. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |