Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, disciplined orchestrator skill: highly token-efficient, clearly sequenced, with genuine safety gates (schema validity, draft-only mutations, benchmark preconditions). Its main limitation is that nearly all executable audit substance is delegated to external references not present in this bundle, so the body alone offers a strong process frame but sparse how-to detail.
Suggestions
Add a brief inline example of the output contract (one sample finding object or the exact schema filename/path) so the 'common JSON contracts' step is executable without guesswork.
Name the exact paths of the shared measurement/benchmark/policy/scoring references (or state that apple-audit.md indexes them) so step 3's 'only the relevant shared ... references' is navigable rather than categorical.
Add an explicit feedback loop for the gates: what to do when schema validation fails or the mutation gate rejects a draft (e.g. revise findings and re-validate before returning).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive — steps like "Collect objective, conversion definition, account and campaign age, geography, date window, timezone, currency, spend, targets, and available data sources" pack concrete specifics with zero padding, and it never explains what Apple Ads or AdServices is. The one wordy spot (the parenthetical resolving `ads/references/apple-audit.md` from plugin root vs. standalone install) is operational path-resolution needed to actually find the file, not over-explanation of known concepts, so it does not drop this to anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The procedural skeleton is concrete (exact file to read, exact inputs to collect, explicit separation of observations/diagnoses/recommendations), but the executable substance — how to evaluate any control, which benchmarks apply, what the JSON contracts look like — is entirely deferred to files not present in this bundle ("Read `ads/references/apple-audit.md` ... and only the relevant shared measurement, benchmark, creative, automation, policy, and scoring references", "through the common JSON contracts"). Per the instruction-only scoring note this lands on anchor 3: concrete guidance but incomplete, with key details missing from the skill itself; it is not anchor 4 because the body alone leaves the auditor without any specific check, example, or schema to execute. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step procedure is clearly sequenced with real checkpoints: "Return schema-valid findings", "Do not calculate final scores in the prompt or write a shared result file", "Render a platform report only from the validated JSON run bundle", and "Keep every account change as a draft until the main mutation gate passes" (which also neutralizes the destructive-operation cap by design, since nothing is executed). It falls short of anchor 5 because no validate-then-fix-then-retry feedback loop is spelled out — the steps say what gates must pass but not what to do when a gate fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is short and well-sectioned (Procedure / Boundaries / Output), and appropriately keeps the bulky audit detail out of line, pointing one level deep to a precisely-pathed reference ("Read `ads/references/apple-audit.md` (resolve it from the plugin root ...)"). However, the secondary references are named only by category ("the relevant shared measurement, benchmark, creative, automation, policy, and scoring references") with no paths, leaving navigation for those slightly loose — anchor 4's 'references mostly clear; minor organization gaps' rather than anchor 5's fully well-signaled references. No bundle files exist in references/, scripts/, or assets/ to verify against. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |