CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ads-creative

Audit paid-ad copy, images, video, hooks, concepts, format coverage, platform-native fit, message match, creative fatigue, accessibility, and policy across supported platforms. Use for creative audit, ad creative, creative fatigue, creative diversity, ad copy review, video review, image review, or production priorities.

74

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-sequenced audit workflow that assumes competence and bakes in anti-overreach guardrails. It could be more actionable with an example refresh/experiment brief and explicit verification checkpoints before returning deliverables.

Suggestions

Add one short example of a prioritized refresh/experiment brief showing the required fields (hypothesis, audience, format, owner, success measure, evidence) to lift actionability.

Insert an explicit verification checkpoint before step 6 (e.g., confirm fatigue diagnoses are grounded in time-series evidence and that quality/compliance/performance are kept separate) to make validation steps explicit rather than implicit.

Name or link the "active-platform specifications and current policy sources" referenced in step 2, so the load step is concrete rather than pointing at unspecified external sources.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: six tight numbered steps plus two concise guardrail sentences, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

5 / 5

Actionability

Steps give concrete, specific guidance — e.g., inventory by named dimensions ("concept, hook, offer, format, placement, audience, date") and return briefs with named fields ("hypothesis, audience, format, owner, success measure, and evidence") — but no example briefs or tooling specifics, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The six steps form a clear sequence (inventory → load specs → evaluate → diagnose fatigue → separate concerns → return briefs), with analytical guardrails ("only from time-series... not age alone"), though validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; the numbered-list structure plus a closing guardrail block is well-organized and navigable, meeting the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that pairs a comprehensive statement of capability with an explicit, synonym-rich "Use for" trigger clause. The only soft spot is slight overlap risk with broader advertising/marketing review skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates a comprehensive set of concrete audit dimensions — "copy, images, video, hooks, concepts, format coverage, platform-native fit, message match, creative fatigue, accessibility, and policy" — leaving little ambiguity about scope.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Audit paid-ad copy, images, video...") and when ("Use for creative audit, ad creative...") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use for..." clause supplies many natural trigger phrases users would actually say ("creative audit, ad creative, creative fatigue, creative diversity, ad copy review, video review, image review, or production priorities"), including synonyms across the domain.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The paid-ad creative-audit niche is clearly carved out with distinct triggers, but a generic advertising/marketing review skill could overlap on terms like "ad copy review" or "video review," so minor conflict risk remains.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
AgriciDaniel/claude-ads
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.