Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced methodology checklist for instruction-only financial modeling that respects token budget and includes validation, though it omits reference formulas and an explicit error-recovery loop. Structure is appropriate for a short single-purpose skill with no bundle files.
Suggestions
In step 2, include the canonical formulas for the core metrics (e.g., CPA = spend ÷ conversions, ROAS = attributed revenue ÷ spend, MER = total revenue ÷ total ad spend) so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Add a brief validate→fix→retry feedback loop after step 3 (e.g., 'If validation fails, correct the flagged input and re-validate before calculating') to reach the top workflow-clarity anchor.
Optionally show the machine-readable output shape (a small JSON skeleton of inputs/formulas/outputs/sensitivities) to make step 6's deliverable concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~15-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding, no explaining what CPA/ROAS are — so every token earns its place per the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics are present (inputs to collect in step 1, validation checks in step 3, base/downside/upside cases, machine-readable outputs), but step 2 says 'Show the formula' without providing reference formulas, a minor gap below the copy-paste-ready bar of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with an explicit validation step (step 3) and a guardrail line; it stops short of 5 because there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop for when validation fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed and a well-organized heading plus numbered list, matching the simple-skill exception that allows a 5 on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |