Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and validation step, but it stays at a high-level instructional altitude, lacking executable specifics for generation and validation and an explicit feedback loop for this batch operation.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable specifics for the Generate step (e.g., named provider/model, exact command or API call, approved aspect-ratio values) so the guidance is copy-paste ready rather than descriptive.
Insert an explicit feedback loop after the Validate step (e.g., 'If validation fails, revise the prompt/params and regenerate; only store assets once validation passes') to lift workflow clarity above the batch-operation cap of 3.
Specify how fidelity, defects, safe zones, accessibility, and policy are validated (tool or checklist) so the validation step is actionable rather than a bare instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Six terse numbered steps plus a brief mandatory-review note assume Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Some concrete guidance exists (record 'source hashes, prompt version, provider/model, cost, output hashes, and dimensions'; preserve 'geometry, packaging, logos, labels'), but the core 'Generate' and 'Validate' steps lack executable specifics on which provider/tool to use or how to perform validation. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with a validation step (step 5) is present, but for a batch generative operation there is no explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop, capping workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric's batch-operation rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into a numbered workflow plus a guardrail note, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |