Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured orchestration skill body: efficient steps, clear sequencing, safety boundaries, and a concrete handoff contract. The main improvement areas are naming the shared references individually and simplifying the reference-path resolution instructions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At roughly 28 lines the body is lean and imperative with zero concept explanations or padding; every step carries operational weight, matching the anchor-5 'every token earns its place' profile. It is not score 4 territory because there is no over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is procedurally concrete: named inputs to collect, an explicit reference path, enumerated control areas, named JSON contracts, and a mutation gate. It falls short of anchor 5 because the shared references are unnamed and the three-way path-resolution parenthetical is convoluted rather than copy-paste clear. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with real checkpoints ('Return schema-valid findings', 'Mark missing inputs... explicitly', 'Keep all account changes as drafts until the main mutation gate passes'). It is not anchor 5 because there is no explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop, and comfortably above anchor 3 because checkpoints are present rather than absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized Procedure/Boundaries/Output sections with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to ads/references/reddit-audit.md in a sub-50-line body. It is not anchor 5 because the 'relevant shared measurement, benchmark, creative, policy, and scoring references' are not individually named and the path-resolution rule spans three fallback locations, creating minor navigation friction. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |