Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured audit procedure with clear sequencing and sensible boundaries, but it leans heavily on external contracts and references that are not bundled here, leaving the actionable detail and inline validation feedback loops somewhat implicit.
Suggestions
Inline at least one concrete example of the expected JSON finding shape or a worked control-evaluation snippet so the procedure is executable without the external `ads` contract.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop around the schema-validity and mutation-gate checks (e.g., 'if schema validation fails, revise the finding and re-validate before returning') rather than only referencing the gate.
Confirm the referenced paths (`ads/references/tiktok-audit.md`, shared measurement/benchmark/creative references) exist in the bundle or note they live in a parent skill, so navigation is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~40 lines), assumes Claude's competence, and never explains concepts Claude already knows; every line carries procedural or constraint value. Not level 2 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps name concrete items to collect and evaluate ("objective, conversion definition, account and campaign age, geography, date window, timezone, currency, spend, targets"), but the procedure defers most detail to external references not in this bundle ("Read the main `ads` operating contract", "Read `ads/references/tiktok-audit.md`") with no worked example. Not level 3 because guidance is not copy-paste executable; not level 1 because the listed inputs and controls are specific, not abstract. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence is present with validation gates referenced ("Keep every account change as a draft until the main mutation gate passes", "Return schema-valid findings", "Render a platform report only from the validated JSON run bundle"). Not level 3 because no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop is detailed inline for the destructive/account-change operations; checkpoints are referenced externally rather than spelled out. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines and organized into clear Procedure/Boundaries/Output sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references ("Read `ads/references/tiktok-audit.md`"). Not level 2 because content is appropriately split and navigable rather than a monolithic wall of text. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |