Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a disciplined, lean procedure with sensible safety boundaries, but it reads as a contract summary rather than an executable guide: validation is delegated to external gates with no feedback loops, and key references are unnamed or unverifiable within this bundle.
Suggestions
Name the exact paths of the shared references (e.g. `ads/references/measurement.md`, `ads/references/benchmarks.md`) instead of the vague "relevant shared measurement, benchmark, creative, policy, and scoring references", so navigation is one clearly-signaled level deep.
Add an explicit validation feedback loop to the procedure, e.g. "If findings fail schema validation, fix and re-validate before returning them to the conductor" — currently the schema-valid requirement has no error-recovery path.
Make the output contract concrete by naming or inlining the JSON schema/contract files the findings must conform to, rather than referring to unnamed "common JSON contracts".
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 33-line body is pure instruction with no concept explanations, no padding, and no filler — every line directs behavior, matching the lean anchor exactly rather than the merely-efficient anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Some guidance is concrete (the input list "business objective, account age, date window, timezone, currency, spend, conversion definition" and the enumerated control areas), but execution steps are abstract — "Normalize the account data", "Return schema-valid findings to the conductor" name no schemas, commands, or example payloads, and all executable detail is delegated to files not present in this bundle. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven-step procedure is clearly sequenced, but validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit — "schema-valid findings" and "the main mutation gate" are referenced without any fix-and-retry loop or instruction for what to do on failure, matching the anchor where checkpoints are missing or implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an appropriately thin overview pointing one level deep ("Read `ads/references/x-audit.md`"), but the shared materials are only described by category ("relevant shared measurement, benchmark, creative, policy, and scoring references") with no paths, and no bundle files exist in this skill to verify any reference resolves. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |