Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete interview steps, full output templates, and explicit workflows. It is slightly held back by a trimmable rationale section, validation steps separated from the main flow, and no post-write verification.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Why this exists' section and de-duplicate the intro against the frontmatter description to tighten conciseness.
Fold the Error Handling checkpoints (especially the ask-before-overwrite and refuse-skeleton rules) inline into the Init/Update workflow steps so validation is visible at the point of action, and add an explicit post-write verification step (e.g. re-read the files and confirm sections are populated).
Consider extracting the full BRAND.md/VOICE.md templates into reference files linked from the body, which would let the overview stay lean and lift progressive_disclosure toward a clear one-level-deep structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient actionable content (interview questions, templates, workflows), but the 'Why this exists' rationale section and intro repetition of the description are minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed; not below midpoint, so 4 rather than 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: a 5-step interview with specific questions, copy-paste-ready fill-in BRAND.md/VOICE.md templates, explicit show/update workflows, and concrete error-handling rules cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step Init sequence and show/update flows are clearly sequenced with validation present (refuse minimal answers, ask before overwriting existing files), but the checkpoints live in a separate Error Handling section rather than inline and there is no post-write verification step — minor gaps keeping it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections, tables, and inlined output templates (which are the deliverable, appropriately inline); no external reference files exist or are needed, so structure is good with only minor organization gaps rather than a clear multi-file overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |