Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A detailed, actionable planning workflow with strong concrete guidance and clear sequencing. The main gaps are minor verbosity from repeated freshness caveats and references to bundle files that are not shipped with the skill.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'directional signal, not a universal rule' freshness caveat into a single note so it is stated once rather than at both Step 2.5 and Step 3.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint before Step 6 (e.g., confirm decay report, cluster progress, and distribution schedule are all populated) so the workflow has a clear validation gate.
Either ship the referenced files (content-templates.md, distribution-playbook.md) in the bundle or remove/inline the references so progressive disclosure points to resources that actually exist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with actionable tables and scaffolds that earn their place, but the freshness caveat ('directional signal, not a universal rule') is repeated at Step 2.5 and Step 3, and some channel-timing prose could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction skill: specific decay-day thresholds, a 60/30/10 content-mix formula, cadence tables with exact post counts, enumerated template names, and copy-ready calendar scaffolds covering the common monthly and quarterly cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 (with sub-steps) are clearly sequenced and include prioritization rules and checklists, but there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints confirming the output is complete before saving. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with one-level-deep references signaled ('skills/blog/references/content-templates.md', '.../distribution-playbook.md'), but those referenced files are not present in the bundle, leaving the references unverifiable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |