Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow document with strong sequencing, validation checkpoints, and a thoughtful untrusted-data security contract. Its main weaknesses are minor verbose asides and the absence of the referenced bundle files (notably the Python helper) that the workflow depends on.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files — at minimum scripts/discourse_research.py, references/research-quality.md, and references/synthesis-contract.md — so the executable workflow steps and the LAWs/trap-classes they cite actually exist.
Trim pedagogical asides that don't change agent behavior, e.g. the 'functionally harmless to leak ... but pedagogically correct' note on os.close(fd) and the 'This mirrors the WebFetch contract' cross-reference.
Confirm the cross-skill paths (skills/blog/references/..., agents/blog-researcher.md) resolve from this skill's install location, or rewrite them as bundle-relative paths so progressive-disclosure navigation does not break.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — phases, command table, JSON schema, and the security contract all earn their tokens — but a few asides could be trimmed, e.g. 'functionally harmless to leak in a short-lived subprocess but pedagogically correct' and 'This mirrors the WebFetch contract in agents/blog-researcher.md'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (the tempfile.mkstemp one-liner, the full discourse_research.py invocation with flags) and a concrete result-item JSON schema, but the core scripts/discourse_research.py is referenced yet not present in the bundle, leaving a gap between instruction and executability. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phase 0–5 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (mandatory pre-flight trap checks with STOP conditions, untrusted-data snippet scanning, LAW verification before delivery), a decomposition checklist, and an error-handling section with feedback loops (reframe/widen, never overwrite silently). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (research-quality.md, synthesis-contract.md, discourse_research.py), but none of the referenced files exist in the bundle, so the navigation structure is sound yet currently leads nowhere. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |