Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with clear, well-sequenced workflows and an auth gate, but it over-explains slightly in places and its two flagged reference files are absent from the bundle, undermining progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add the missing references/commands.md and references/troubleshooting.md files (or remove the dangling references) so the on-demand loading pointers resolve.
Add an explicit confirm/validation step before destructive library operations such as 'notebook_manager.py remove'.
Deduplicate the auth-check instructions — describe the gate pattern once and reference it from the query workflow instead of restating it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and action-oriented with command tables and code blocks, but the auth-check pattern is restated in multiple sections and a few prose passages (e.g. the FLOW evidence triple intro) could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands throughout ('python3 scripts/run.py ask_question.py --question ...') with concrete flag variations covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Query and setup workflows are clearly sequenced with an explicit auth-gate checkpoint and a STOP/ANALYZE/SYNTHESIZE follow-up loop, but destructive library operations like 'remove' lack an explicit validation/confirm step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body signals on-demand loading of 'references/commands.md' and 'references/troubleshooting.md', but the references/ directory does not exist, so the referenced detail files are missing and navigation breaks. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |