Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, directive body for a complex vault-ingest transaction with strong validation checkpoints and recovery feedback loops. It is mostly lean and actionable, with only minor conciseness and progressive-disclosure gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive, assuming Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but at ~150 lines a few sections (e.g., the capture-maturity bullets) could be tightened slightly, landing just below the lean-every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands are provided (CORE resolution, 'transaction inspect', 'transaction apply --approved-plan-sha256', 'checkpoint'), but placeholder paths and a few abstract directives ('Reuse existing canonical pages') leave minor gaps versus fully executable everywhere. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This batch/destructive operation has an explicit validation chain — inspect → user review of approval_sha256 → apply, plus exit-75 re-read/rebuild and 'transaction recover' feedback loops and a pre-apply disclosure checklist — satisfying the validation-checkpoint requirement for risky operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear sectioned overview (scope, analyze, provenance, transaction, preview/apply/recover) with well-signaled one-level-deep markdown links to provenance.md and operation-transactions.md; the references resolve outside the local bundle under $PRODUCT_ROOT, a minor organization gap versus the ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |