CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wiki-query

Answer an explicitly vault-scoped question from an Obsidian wiki without changing it. Use when the user selects the vault as the evidence source: query the wiki, query quick, query deep, explain from the wiki, summarize the vault, find in wiki, search the wiki, or based on the wiki. Do not route ordinary general-knowledge questions here.

73

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured read-only workflow with executable commands, an explicit verification checkpoint, fallback handling, and a closing checkpoint section. Actionability and progressive disclosure sit just below the top because $VAULT/$QUERY and PRODUCT_ROOT are resolved narratively and the referenced files are sibling-skill/external paths with no local bundle to verify against.

Suggestions

Add a short concrete snippet that resolves $VAULT and $QUERY from the user's selection so the retrieve command is copy-paste-ready end to end, not just the invocation line.

Clarify that provenance.md and the sibling SKILL.md references live under the installed product root (consistent with the PRODUCT_ROOT note) so the navigation target is unambiguous.

Consider a one-line inline summary of the claim-ledger schema fields (accepted/provisional/contested/unsupported) or confirm provenance.md covers them, so the Assess-evidence step is self-contained without the external reference.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (security, root resolution, depth, retrieve, assess, answer, checkpoint) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable bash commands (the contracts --verify check and retrieve invocation with explicit flags) plus specific ledger paths, but $VAULT/$QUERY resolution and the PRODUCT_ROOT placeholder are described narratively rather than as a fully copy-paste-ready sequence.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Five-step Retrieve sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (capability --verify), a named fallback path ("fall back to wiki/index.md... Say which fallback was used"), and a Checkpoint section that re-verifies citations and names evidence gaps; the skill is explicitly read-only so the destructive/batch cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (provenance.md, sibling wiki-retrieve and wiki-cli SKILL.md files), but the referenced paths point to sibling skills / a non-local references directory rather than bundle files within this skill, so navigation cannot be fully verified against an actual bundle structure.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: third-person voice, explicit what/when structure, comprehensive natural trigger phrasing, and a clear negative boundary that reduces conflict risk. The only minor gap is that several listed actions are overlapping query-depth variants rather than fully distinct capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions scoped to the vault ("query quick, query deep", "explain from the wiki", "summarize the vault", "find in wiki", "search the wiki"), but several are overlapping query variants rather than fully distinct capabilities, leaving minor gaps versus comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly and explicitly answers both what ("Answer an explicitly vault-scoped question... without changing it") and when ("Use when the user selects the vault as the evidence source:") with concrete trigger phrases plus a negative boundary.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger coverage including synonyms and phrasings users would say ("query the wiki, query quick, query deep, explain from the wiki, summarize the vault, find in wiki, search the wiki, or based on the wiki").

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Niche vault-scoped-evidence framing plus the explicit negative boundary ("Do not route ordinary general-knowledge questions here") gives it clear distinct triggers with minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.