Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, actionable routing-and-guardrails document: concrete commands, explicit MCP verification with recovery, and disciplined cross-skill delegation. Its only notable deductions are unpinned maintenance details outside a deprecation section and the absence of a post-batch verification loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — routing table, short sections, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but time-sensitive details ("tested @ahrefs/mcp@0.0.11", "Package check (2026-07-10)") sit outside a deprecated/old-patterns section, which the guidelines penalize. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: a concrete routing table, install paths ("extensions/ahrefs/install.sh"), and a runnable cost command ("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo run dataforseo_costs.py"), with the minor gap that MCP tool names per routing command are not specified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear with most checkpoints present — prerequisites, an explicit MCP-connection verification step with a recovery path, and batch cost guardrails (estimate, surface, log) — but batch runs lack a result-verification/retry feedback loop, so it falls short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (~55-line), well-organized body with no inlined bulk content; external references (install script, cost script, sibling skills seo-backlinks/seo-dataforseo) are one level deep and clearly signaled, matching the simple-skill ideal of well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |