Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured planning skill with a clear phased workflow, good use of asset templates for progressive disclosure, and explicit error handling. Its main weaknesses are placeholder filler in the KPI table, directional steps lacking method specifics, and the absence of explicit mid-workflow validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Replace the "..." placeholder cells in the KPI Targets table with concrete example targets per industry, or generate the table only after real baselines are gathered, to remove token-filler (conciseness).
Add explicit validation checkpoints between phases (e.g., "Confirm KPI targets and scope with the user before starting Phase 2") so the multi-step workflow's checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit (workflow_clarity).
Make directional steps actionable by naming the method or tool — e.g., for "Estimate their domain authority" specify the signal/tool, and for schema markup list specific schema types per page type (actionability).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient bullet-based prose with no re-explanation of concepts Claude knows, but the KPI Targets table uses literal "..." placeholder cells in every column, adding tokens that convey no data. It is not a 3 because not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete artifacts, templates, and DataForSEO tools, but several steps stay directional ("Estimate their domain authority", "Assess their E-E-A-T signals") without specifying method or signal, and the KPI table has no example targets. It is not a 3 because guidance is incomplete rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step process and four-phase roadmap are clearly sequenced with timelines, and an error-handling table gives input-recovery paths. It is not a 3 because there are no explicit validation checkpoints between phases (e.g., confirming scope before proceeding); checkpoints are implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with a dedicated Industry Templates section that signals one-level-deep references to assets/, and all six referenced templates (saas.md, local-service.md, ecommerce.md, publisher.md, agency.md, generic.md) are verified present, so navigation is easy and content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |