Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with a concrete MCP call, field mappings, and ROI formula. Minor redundancy across the filtering steps and the Important section is the main conciseness cost.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the eligibility criteria: state them once in step 4 and reference them from steps 6-8 and the Important section instead of restating.
Tighten step 3's blocker analysis, which currently restates the inward/outward logic twice; a single clear rule would reduce tokens.
Specify how to resolve cloudId (e.g. from the epic URL host) rather than offering 'default to' as a fallback.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and procedural with concrete MCP calls and field IDs, assuming Claude's competence; some redundancy between step 4, the 'Important' section, and steps 6-8 keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: a specific MCP tool name, concrete JQL, exact customfield IDs, a t-shirt-size effort table, an ROI formula, and copy-paste output templates covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence with a preflight dependency checkpoint and an empty-results branch; the operation is read-only so heavy validation loops are not required, but there are minor gaps (e.g. cloudId resolution is hand-wavy), keeping it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Preflight/Inputs/Steps/Important sections with a clearly signaled one-level reference to sibling requirements.json; no nested references and no bundle files, so structure carries it to 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |