Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model instruction-only skill: concrete, executable, and tightly organized around a single check-and-report workflow. Its only real gap is validation robustness — the diff command assumes exactly one prior commit and the flow ends at 'offer to make changes' without a re-verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and every element (trigger file list, per-manifest checklists, report template, offer step) earns its place. It matches the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor rather than 4, where minor padding would remain. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste-ready command (git diff --name-only HEAD~1..HEAD), concrete per-manifest review criteria with examples (new depends_on entries, PATH setup handles new binaries), and an exact report template covering the common cases — the anchor-5 fit for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with the report/verdict acting as the checkpoint, but minor validation gaps remain: step 1 only inspects the last commit (missing a fallback for multiple commits or uncommitted changes) and no re-check loop after applying updates. This fits 'most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than 5, and the skill is a read-only check so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, roughly 50-line, single-purpose skill with no bundle files and no need for external references; its well-organized sections (When to Run, Steps, report template) satisfy the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |