CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pre-push-check

Run the full pre-push review pipeline — code review checks, self-review against CLAUDE.md, and a final report.

67

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a concise, fully actionable pre-push workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a clear decision gate before pushing. It is well-organized and self-contained with no padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and direct — concrete commands with no concept-explanation padding — and every section earns its place; the minor overlap between the step 3 and step 4 checklists does not rise to verbosity.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides executable commands (git diff --stat, git log --oneline, devflow check, yarn lint/build) and a copy-paste-ready report template with concrete placeholders.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced six-step pipeline with explicit validation (devflow check, CLAUDE.md compliance checklist) and a PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict gate before the outward-facing push, satisfying the destructive-operation feedback-loop requirement.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Self-contained single-purpose skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections; no external references are needed, so the organized inline structure scores full marks.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

60%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description concretely states the skill's actions but omits any explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance, leaving the when-to-use half only implied. Adding natural trigger phrases would lift completeness, trigger-term quality, and distinctiveness together.

Suggestions

Append a "Use when..." clause naming natural triggers, e.g. "Use when about to push code, before running git push, or when the user asks for a pre-push review."

Add common user phrasings ("before pushing", "review my changes before push", "pre-push checks") to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Sharpen distinctiveness by framing it as a pre-push gate specifically, distinguishing it from general code-review skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — "code review checks, self-review against CLAUDE.md, and a final report" — rather than vague language, matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does, but the "when to use it" half is only implied by the pre-push framing; the missing explicit trigger guidance caps completeness at 2 per the rubric guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes "pre-push review" as a relevant keyword but offers no "Use when..." clause or common phrasings like "before I push" or "review my changes", so coverage of natural terms is partial.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The pre-push niche is fairly specific, but without distinct explicit triggers it could still overlap with general code-review or commit-message skills.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
AndreJorgeLopes/devflow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.