Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear multi-step workflow and good organization. The main gap is actionability could be nudged toward copy-paste-ready examples (e.g. sample recall tool invocations) and workflow clarity toward explicit validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, contains no concept padding, and every section (Steps, Important, the template, $ARGUMENTS) earns its place — matches the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete actionable guidance (specific recall calls for full query, file paths, and domain concepts; a four-category synthesis; a presentation template) but as an instruction-only skill it stops short of copy-paste-ready commands, matching the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an interaction checkpoint at step 5 ('Ask the user') and explicit no-memory handling, but validation checkpoints are light rather than explicit feedback loops — fits the 4 anchor; the destructive/batch cap does not apply to this non-destructive skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, well-organized into ## Steps and ## Important with no need for external bundle files — the rubric's simple-skill exception lets this score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |