Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, highly actionable with executable code, and has a clear sequenced workflow with appropriate validation checkpoints for the destructive clone operation. Minor redundancy between the Important section and earlier content, and a slightly monolithic inlining of scoring/output rules, keep it just short of top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with directly relevant code blocks and terse directives; the 'Important' section restates local-first, scoping, and name+description-only rules already covered above, which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable bash loops, concrete glab/gh CLI commands, and an exact machine-checked output template; mostly copy-paste ready, with the only gap being the offloaded lib functions whose internals are intentionally external (and justified). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step sequence with validation checkpoints (ask user on no repos, branch to step 3 on ambiguity, confirm before cloning, CLI-fallback); the destructive clone step has explicit user confirmation so the cap-3 does not apply, with only a minor gap around retry on a failed clone. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill with well-organized sections and a clearly signaled one-level-deep external reference (the determinism lib / CONTRACT.md); not a 5 because inlined scoring rules and output templates could be separated, and it is well over 50 lines. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |