review-document
Use when reviewing a prose document — KB article, RFC, spike, runbook, PRD, design doc, knowledge-base page — hosted on Google Docs, Confluence, a local file path, or an arbitrary URL. Checks correctness, internal consistency, audience-fit, prose clarity, and external-claim verification; cross-checks against existing platform comments to avoid re-flagging; returns severity-tagged findings with anchor + quote + concrete fix. Use when asked to "review this doc / KB / RFC / spike / runbook / PRD" and the target is prose, not a code diff. Counterpart to the write-spike skill. NOT for code diffs — use /devflow:review for those.
76
95%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The workflow reads external documents from Google Docs, Confluence, and arbitrary URLs where outsiders can inject arbitrary free text into the reviewed documents and comments.
- Repository
- AndreJorgeLopes/devflow
- Commit
bd4b70c
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.