CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

review

Use when reviewing a PR/MR by URL or the local working-tree diff — runs multi-perspective parallel agents (bug scanner, CLAUDE.md compliance, test coverage, plan alignment, git history, sibling MR/epic coherence) with confidence scoring and optional draft inline comments on the MR. Triggers for `/devflow:review` or any "review this PR/MR" request.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

The canonical home for this skill is review in AndreJorgeLopes/devflow

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-sequenced, operationally dense orchestration skill with excellent workflow structure and validation checkpoints, undermined by an incomplete bundle: its most substantive content is delegated to AGENTS.md, TEMPLATES.md, and requirements.json, none of which ship alongside SKILL.md. Some rule duplication between the phase text and the 'Important rules' recap also costs tokens.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced sibling files (AGENTS.md, TEMPLATES.md, requirements.json) inside the skill bundle — Phases 2–5 delegate agent definitions, the 0–100 scoring rubric, the output template, and the gh/glab posting calls to them, so the workflow dead-ends without them.

De-duplicate rules restated between phase text and the 'Important rules' section (Source-of-Truth hierarchy, pagination mandate, never-local-diffs, RAISED-RESOLVED-FIXED handling) — keep each rule in one place and reference it from the other.

Remove or relocate the design-doc reference (docs/plans/2026-03-26-consolidated-review-skill-design.md) — it is provenance rather than operational guidance, and the path will not resolve outside the original repo.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is almost purely operational (exact CLI invocations, thresholds, decision rules) with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but several rules are stated twice — the Source-of-Truth hierarchy, pagination mandate, never-local-diffs rule, and RAISED-RESOLVED-FIXED handling each appear both in the phase text and again in 'Important rules' — which could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Presented commands are copy-paste ready (gh/glab api invocations with exact endpoints, pagination flags, mode-detection thresholds, named MCP tools), but the core machinery of Phases 2–5 — agent definitions, finding JSON schema, scoring rubric, output template, and posting API calls — is delegated to AGENTS.md and TEMPLATES.md, which are not present in the bundle, dead-ending the middle of the workflow.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The pipeline is explicitly sequenced (Preflight dependency STOP rule → Phase 0 mode detection with numeric thresholds → phased fetch/context → parallel dispatch → cross-check → output → optional posting → retain) with genuine validation checkpoints: required-dep STOP, non-interactive fallback for optional deps, fix-commit verification for RAISED-RESOLVED statuses, diff/thread caps, PENDING-state confirmation, and a closing rules checklist.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The split design is right — heavy content (agent definitions, scoring rubric, output template) is delegated one level deep and clearly signaled ('Read AGENTS.md (sibling to this SKILL.md)…') — but none of the referenced sibling files (AGENTS.md, TEMPLATES.md, requirements.json) exist in the bundle, so navigation dead-ends; the docs/plans design-doc pointer is also a dangling provenance reference.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete, third-person, with explicit 'Use when' triggers and a clearly enumerated capability list. Its only weaknesses are missing common trigger synonyms and a somewhat broad catch-all trigger phrase that could collide with a generic code-review skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Runs multi-perspective parallel agents (bug scanner, CLAUDE.md compliance, test coverage, plan alignment, git history, sibling MR/epic coherence) with confidence scoring and optional draft inline comments" names six specific review perspectives plus two concrete outputs — comprehensive coverage of the skill's actions, matching the top anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

It opens with an explicit "Use when reviewing a PR/MR by URL or the local working-tree diff" and closes with concrete trigger phrases ("review this PR/MR"), while the middle states the what in concrete terms — both what and when are explicit with concrete triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Triggers for `/devflow:review` or any 'review this PR/MR' request" plus "local working-tree diff" gives good natural-phrase coverage including the slash command, but common synonyms like "code review" and "merge request" are missing, so it falls between the good-coverage (4) and comprehensive-synonym (5) anchors.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The capability set (sibling MR/epic coherence, CLAUDE.md compliance, Hindsight-adjacent confidence scoring) is a distinct niche, but the broad trigger "any 'review this PR/MR' request" overlaps generic code-review skills, giving minor conflict risk rather than minimal.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

AndreJorgeLopes/devflow

Path

devflow-plugin/skills/review/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.