CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

task-prioritize

Reprioritize a devflow task — move between priority folders (P0-P4) and update frontmatter.

56

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/task-prioritize/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a simple single-purpose task, but its destructive file-move and frontmatter-rewrite workflow lacks any validation checkpoints, capping workflow clarity. Adding a verify step would meaningfully raise the score.

Suggestions

Add a validation checkpoint after the find step: confirm the task file exists and is not under done/ before proceeding, and abort with a clear message if missing.

Add a post-move verification (e.g. confirm the file now resides under the new priority folder and frontmatter priority matches) to close the destructive-operation feedback loop.

Replace hardcoded absolute paths (/Users/andrejorgelopes/dev/devflow/tasks) with a parameter or resolved base path so the commands are portable and executable across environments.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; only minor trimmable elements (the trailing $ARGUMENTS line and a couple of redundant guard notes) keep it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (find, mkdir -p, mv) and a frontmatter snippet with placeholders, but hardcoded absolute paths and unfilled placeholders leave minor execution gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The four steps are clearly sequenced, but this destructive operation (moving a file and rewriting frontmatter) has no validation checkpoint (verify file exists, confirm not in done/, verify after move), which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This under-50-line single-purpose skill has no need for external references and is well-organized into Inputs, Steps, and Important sections, qualifying for the simple-skill exception at 5.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinguishable but omits any 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which caps completeness and trigger term quality at the midpoint. Adding an explicit use-when clause with natural user phrases would lift the weakest dimensions.

Suggestions

Append a 'Use when...' clause naming natural user phrases, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to change a task's priority, reprioritize a task, or move a task between P0-P4 folders.'

Add common synonyms/variants (e.g. 'change priority', 'reorder backlog', 'promote/demote task') to broaden trigger term coverage.

Keep the concrete action list but consider mentioning the frontmatter field name ('priority') to raise specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('devflow task') and two concrete actions ('move between priority folders (P0-P4)' and 'update frontmatter'), matching the 1-2 concrete actions anchor without reaching comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does, but a 'when should Claude use it' / 'Use when...' clause is entirely missing, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords like 'reprioritize', 'priority', and 'task' appear but there are no 'Use when...' trigger phrases and no synonyms or natural variations users would say.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Reprioritize a devflow task' defines a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though the absence of explicit trigger phrases keeps it just below the fully distinct anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
AndreJorgeLopes/devflow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.