visualizations-config
Configure visualization location, style presets, and output preferences
37
33%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./devflow-plugin/skills/visualizations-config/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
17%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is too terse and abstract to effectively guide skill selection. It lacks natural trigger terms users would use, provides no 'Use when...' guidance, and the capabilities listed are vague configuration actions without specifying what kind of visualizations or tools are involved.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause specifying triggers like 'when the user wants to change chart appearance, set default plot styles, or configure where visualizations are saved'.
Include natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'chart', 'graph', 'plot', 'theme', 'color scheme', 'save location', or specific tool/library names.
Specify concrete actions instead of generic 'configure'—e.g., 'Set default chart themes, choose output file formats (PNG, SVG), and specify save directories for generated visualizations'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (visualization) and lists some actions (configure location, style presets, output preferences), but these are still somewhat abstract—'configure' is vague and the specific capabilities like what style presets or output preferences entail are not elaborated. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | The description only partially addresses 'what' (configure visualization settings) and completely lacks a 'when' clause or any explicit trigger guidance. Per the rubric, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also weak, so this scores a 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The terms 'visualization location', 'style presets', and 'output preferences' are not natural phrases users would say. Users are more likely to say things like 'chart settings', 'graph style', 'plot configuration', or 'where to save my chart'. The description lacks common user-facing vocabulary. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The mention of 'visualization' narrows the domain somewhat, but 'style presets' and 'output preferences' could overlap with many other skills related to charts, dashboards, plotting libraries, or general configuration/settings skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a clear multi-step workflow for configuring a visualization system with decent structure and a concrete config example. However, it lacks validation checkpoints for filesystem operations, uses placeholder bash commands instead of fully executable ones, and inlines content that could benefit from external references. The interactive setup section describes prompts abstractly rather than providing actionable templates.
Suggestions
Add validation steps after writing config (e.g., verify JSON is valid, confirm directories exist) to improve workflow reliability
Replace placeholder bash commands like `mkdir -p <path>/{<categories>}` with concrete executable examples using the default values
Provide a concrete README.md template rather than abstractly describing what it should contain
Extract the full JSON config schema and color definitions into a separate reference file to improve progressive disclosure
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably structured but includes some unnecessary verbosity, such as explaining what each category is for (architecture, workflows, etc.) and spelling out interactive prompts in detail. Some sections like the color palette and init config could be more compact. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a concrete JSON config example and some bash commands, but key steps like 'Create README' and 'Interactive Setup' are described abstractly rather than with executable code or templates. The bash commands use placeholders rather than being fully executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced, but there are no validation checkpoints — no step verifies the config was written correctly, no check that directories were created successfully, and no error handling or feedback loops for filesystem operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but the full JSON config schema is inlined when it could be referenced externally. No bundle files exist to offload detail to, and there are no references to supporting documents despite mentioning related commands like `/devflow:update-visualizations`. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- AndreJorgeLopes/devflow
- Commit
b0b1bb6
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.