visualizations-config

Configure visualization location, style presets, and output preferences

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, mostly actionable configuration workflow with a clean single-file layout. Its main gaps are a missing verification checkpoint and a vague README-generation step.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verification checkpoint after Step 3/4 (e.g. confirm the JSON parses and the category folders exist) before proceeding to the report, to satisfy the validation requirement for file-writing operations.

Make the README step concrete by providing an actual template or the literal style-guide content rather than 'Style guide based on chosen preset'.

Trim the opening sentence and consolidate the repeated 'Ask:'/'Options:' framing to improve token efficiency.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean concrete config and options, but the opening sentence ('You are configuring the visualization system...') and the repeated 'Ask:' framing add overhead that could be trimmed.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides a concrete JSON config block and executable `mkdir -p`/`touch` commands, but Step 5's README generation ('Style guide based on chosen preset') is under-specified with no actual template.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The seven steps are clearly sequenced, but there is no validation/verification checkpoint after writing config and creating folders; per the rubric, missing validation in batch file-writing operations caps workflow clarity at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and the single SKILL.md is well-organized with clearly headed Steps 1–7 and no nested references, which the rubric allows to score 3 for skills needing no external references.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and on-domain but generic: it tells what the skill configures without any explicit trigger guidance or natural user-facing keywords. Adding a 'Use when...' clause with concrete terms would lift its highest-weight dimensions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when setting up visualization defaults, changing diagram style, or switching output format (mermaid/excalidraw).' to satisfy the completeness 'when' requirement.

Include natural keywords users would say (diagrams, mermaid, excalidraw, style, output format) instead of only 'style presets' and 'output preferences' to improve trigger term quality.

Replace the repeated 'Configure' verb with distinct concrete actions (e.g. 'Set the visualization directory, pick a style preset, and choose output format') to raise specificity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the visualization domain and three aspects ('location, style presets, and output preferences') but repeats a single generic verb ('Configure') rather than listing multiple distinct concrete actions, so it falls short of the comprehensive-action anchor.	2 / 3
Completeness	It states what the skill does but provides no 'when' guidance; per the rubric, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	'visualization', 'style presets', and 'output preferences' are relevant but omit natural variations a user would actually say (e.g. diagrams, mermaid, format, set up) and there is no trigger phrasing.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The visualization-config niche is somewhat specific, but without distinct triggers it could still overlap with other diagram/visualization skills.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: AndreJorgeLopes/devflow
Commit: 9556c94

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.