Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, executable workflow with concrete commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and appropriate offloading of detail to real, one-level-deep reference files. Concise and actionable with no padded explanations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and action-oriented throughout — it assumes Claude's competence, states exact paths and commands, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (git merge-base, git diff --stat/--name-status, mkdir -p), exact file/path conventions, and a referenced template, giving copy-paste-ready guidance rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints — an AskUserQuestion gate when reports are missing (Step 2) and a verify-then-report loop in Step 7 — matching the feedback-loop anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that offloads detail to a one-level-deep, clearly-signaled reference (doc-template.md, verified present) and an external template-versioning.md reference, with content appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |