Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted, highly actionable skill that clearly defines a multi-step workflow with proper validation checkpoints, error handling, and feedback loops. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity — the rationale for separate invocations is repeated in multiple places, and some sections could be more concise. The progressive disclosure is reasonable with references to external templates, though the main file carries substantial inline detail that could be offloaded.
Suggestions
Consolidate the explanation of why separate invocations matter into a single location (e.g., the Constraints section) and reference it briefly elsewhere, rather than repeating it in the intro, Step 4, and Error Handling.
Consider moving the detailed quality check criteria and retry prompt templates into a reference file to reduce the length of the main SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly detailed and well-structured, but includes some unnecessary verbosity — e.g., explaining why separate invocations matter multiple times (in the intro, Step 4, Constraints, and Error Handling), and the data availability table with fallback cascade is somewhat over-explained. Some sections could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete, executable guidance: exact file paths to read, specific agent invocation parameters with structured context blocks, quality check criteria with retry instructions, precise output format for the summary, and a standardized schema for recommendations. Every step tells Claude exactly what to do. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced (Steps 1-6) with explicit validation checkpoints after both the draft phase (quality check with retry logic) and critique phase (quality check with retry logic). Error handling covers context leaks, generic outputs, and agent failures with specific recovery paths. The feedback loops (retry with more specific context, retry with sharper adversarial instruction) are well-defined. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references external files (prfaq-workflow.md, prfaq-report-template.md) which is good progressive disclosure, but no bundle files were provided to verify these exist. The SKILL.md itself is quite long (~180 lines of substantive content) and some material like the detailed quality check criteria and retry prompts could potentially be moved to reference files. The structure within the file is well-organized with clear headers. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |