Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, fully actionable walkthrough of a single CLI with a clear three-step workflow and useful verification/recovery guidance. It loses a point on workflow clarity (no explicit validate→fix→retry framing) and progressive disclosure (slightly over the simple-skill line with an inline flags table), but is otherwise strong.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Step 1, e.g. 'If cluster count or edge count looks unreasonable, rerun with --full before naming clusters' — a clear validate→fix→retry loop would lift workflow_clarity to 5.
Consider moving the Step 1 flags table into a references/FLAGS.md file referenced one level deep, which would tighten the main body and lift progressive_disclosure.
State the expected output location of clusters.json / names.json up front in Step 1 so the reader knows where intermediate artifacts land before Step 3 reads them.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives commands and flag tables without explaining what TF-IDF, embeddings, or clusters are, and every prose note (e.g. names keyed by vocabulary so they survive rebuilds) earns its place; not below 5 because there is no padding to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout — 'obsidian-wiki sessions-build --json', 'obsidian-wiki sessions-clusters --unnamed --json', the sessions-name heredoc with a concrete JSON example, and 'open ~/.claude/session-brain/graph.html' — covering the common build/name/report cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (Build → Name → Report) with checkpoints present (report headline numbers in Step 1, report the map in Step 3, '--full rebuilds from scratch' recovery hint in Notes); not 5 because there is no explicit validate→fix→retry loop framing, and not below 4 because verification steps are present so the batch-operation cap at 3 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into titled sections (comparison table, Step 1/2/3, Notes) with all content appropriately inline for a single-CLI skill and no nested or buried references; not 5 because, at ~88 lines, it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception and holds a flags table inline that could be split out, though it is small enough to be reasonable inline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |