Conciseness

The body is dense and operational — signal tables with exact contributions, complete bash scripts, a copy-ready report template — with only minor over-explanation ("You don't need exact arithmetic — make a confident judgement", and the cross-skill "Redirect Stub Handling" section addressed to other skills). This matches anchor 4 ("Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed") rather than anchor 3's noticeably unnecessary explanations.

Actionability

Everything is executable: exact scoring formulas with max contributions and thresholds, a complete pre-write git snapshot script with failure handling, an exact redirect-stub frontmatter template, per-field merge instructions, and copy-paste `memory sync` and `qmd` commands. This matches anchor 5 ("Fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases").

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced with mode gating, and the destructive merge path has explicit validation checkpoints: a pre-write snapshot that aborts all writes on failure, per-pair confirmation prompts, per-file verification during link rewriting, and a final grep check for missed links (5f). The destructive/batch cap does not apply because feedback loops are present throughout, matching anchor 5.

Progressive Disclosure

The single-file body is well-sectioned and its only file pointers are clearly signaled and one level deep (`llm-wiki/SKILL.md`, `.skills/llm-wiki/references/MEMORY.md`); the bundle ships no reference files, which I verified. Minor gap: cross-skill content ("Redirect Stub Handling" for wiki-export/wiki-query/wiki-lint/cross-linker, and QMD refresh) could live in separate reference files — anchor 4 ("Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps").

Specificity

"Detect and merge wiki pages representing the same concept under different names" names the domain and two concrete actions (detect, merge), but coverage is not comprehensive — audit mode, redirect stubs, and wikilink rewriting are absent. This matches anchor 3 ("Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive") rather than anchor 4, which requires several specific actions.

Completeness

Both "what" (detect and merge same-concept wiki pages) and "when" ("Use for page-identity deduplication and consolidation") are explicitly stated, plus an exclusion clause. The "when" leans on abstract jargon ("page-identity deduplication") rather than concrete user-mentionable trigger phrases, keeping it at anchor 4 instead of 5.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "wiki pages", "same concept under different names", "deduplication", and "consolidation" give good keyword coverage, but common user phrasings such as "duplicates" or "duplicate pages" are missing. It exceeds anchor 3 ("missing common variations") but falls short of anchor 5's synonym-complete coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Wiki-page identity deduplication is a clear niche, and the explicit boundary "not for link repair or general linting" fences off the closest neighboring skills. Minimal conflict risk, matching anchor 5.