Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-organized router skill with concrete routing tables, path mappings, and an explicit delegation contract that avoids duplicating destination logic. Minor redundancy between the table, routing rules, and examples is the only notable inefficiency.
Suggestions
Trim the Examples section or the re-listing of targets in Routing Rules, since the subcommand table already enumerates them, to remove redundancy.
The 'auto' subcommand row references 'rules below' but the rules section covers paths rather than inference heuristics; consider clarifying what 'auto' actually does.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept over-explanation and clear section headers, but the Examples section and Routing Rules re-list the same subcommand targets already shown in the table, adding mild redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready routing guidance: an exact subcommand-to-skill table, specific path/source mappings (~/.claude -> claude-history-ingest), and a ready-to-use clarification prompt for the ambiguous case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Routing is clearly sequenced (explicit name -> path/source -> ambiguous ask) with the ambiguity-clarification acting as a checkpoint; no explicit validation/feedback loop, though none is required for a non-destructive router. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained SKILL.md under ~50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Subcommands, Routing Rules, Execution Contract, UX Convention, Examples); the simple-skill exception for well-structured content applies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |