Conciseness

The body is almost entirely operational (CLI commands, field tables, exit-code semantics) with no basic-concept padding, but a few spots could be trimmed: 'The whole point of the check is...' re-explains the revision check, and the Notes section repeats the patch-refusal and index/log points already made in Steps 3-4. Anchor 4 — efficient with minor instances of over-explanation.

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: exact commands with flags (--expect-staged, --expect-live, --expect-new), a field table for the inventory JSON, concrete conflict semantics (exit code 9 with 'conflict: ...' on stderr), and the rejection naming convention ('-2' suffix). The only non-mechanical step (patch merging) is explicitly justified as judgment work. Anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (config check -> inventory -> per-file review -> apply -> reconcile -> report) with strong validation for a batch/mutating operation: revision preconditions, the --expect-new guard against concurrent writers, and an explicit conflict-recovery loop (re-run staging list, show the user what changed, ask again) rather than blind retry. Anchor 5.

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained SKILL.md with nothing inlined that belongs in a separate file; sections are clearly organized and the one external pointer (the Config Resolution Protocol in llm-wiki/SKILL.md) is well-signaled and one level deep. No bundle files exist, and none are needed.

Specificity

Names three concrete actions — 'Review staged wiki writes', 'promote accepted pages to final locations', 'rejected pages return to _raw/' — plus a config gate, but coverage has minor gaps (listing/inspecting staged files and applying patches are unmentioned). Matches anchor 4 ('lists several specific actions; minor gaps'), not 5 since coverage isn't comprehensive.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (review, promote, reject staged writes with rejected pages returning to _raw/) and 'when' ('Use for staging approval/commit... when WIKI_STAGED_WRITES is enabled'). Both are concrete and explicit, matching the anchor-5 example's structure.

Trigger Term Quality

'staged wiki writes', 'staging approval/commit', and 'WIKI_STAGED_WRITES' are natural phrases a user would say, but common variations like 'accept/reject staged pages' or 'pending wiki writes' are missing. Good coverage with a few natural terms absent — anchor 4.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (staging approval/commit) with distinctive tokens — WIKI_STAGED_WRITES, _raw/, promote — that separate it from general wiki-writing skills. Minimal conflict risk; the config gate further disambiguates.