Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill with strong validation feedback loops and concrete copy-paste commands throughout. It is somewhat verbose in its distillation heuristics and frontmatter mechanics, and relies on prose pointers to sibling skills rather than a structured reference index, which lightly caps conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Worth distilling / Not worth distilling' lists and provenance rationale into a compact heuristic or move them to a reference file; Claude already knows how to judge what is worth recording.
Add a small 'References' section indexing the llm-wiki sections (Config Resolution, Link Format, Provenance Markers, .manifest.json contract) as a navigable list rather than inline prose pointers.
Move the full page-frontmatter template into a bundled template file and reference it, keeping only the field-purpose summary inline to reduce token weight.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete bash snippets and tight tables, but sections like the 'Worth distilling / Not worth distilling' lists and repeated provenance rationale re-explain judgment Claude already has, and the page-format block restates frontmatter mechanics at length. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands throughout (git merge-base check, obsidian-wiki code-understand invocations, qmd update/embed/get/ls) plus a complete page-frontmatter template and concrete manifest/index/log/hot update formats — fully executable and covers the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: the git merge-base ancestor check with rebase/force-push fallback (Step 2), prune-stale-relationships verification (Step 3b), and QMD refresh with failure/skip reporting (Step 7) — exactly the validate→fix→retry pattern the rubric rewards. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly signaled steps and sub-sections, and it points one level deep to llm-wiki/SKILL.md sections for shared protocol detail rather than duplicating them; however no bundle reference/scripts/assets files exist and several shared protocols are referenced by prose pointer rather than a navigable file index, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |