Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable diagnostic skill with concrete bilingual examples and a clean workflow, but it is somewhat verbose with redundant restating of failure categories and generic best-practice padding.
Suggestions
Collapse the redundant failure-category listings: present categories once in Step 2 and reference them from Step 3 and Diagnostic Questions rather than restating each.
Trim the 'Best Practices' section to only non-obvious guidance; drop generic advice like 'Read error messages carefully' and 'Consult documentation' that Claude already knows.
Consider moving the six full worked examples into references/failure_patterns.md and keeping one representative example inline to reduce body length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but padded: the failure categories are restated across Step 2, Step 3, Diagnostic Questions, and Best Practices, and 'Best Practices' repeats generic advice Claude already knows ('Read error messages carefully', 'Consult documentation'). | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, mostly executable Coq and Isabelle examples with exact error text and copy-paste solutions naming specific tactics, with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (Gather Context, Identify Category, Analyze Root Cause, Explain, Suggest Solutions) is present; this is a diagnostic (not destructive/batch) skill so the validation cap does not apply, though explicit checkpoints are light. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned body with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference to the real references/failure_patterns.md; content is mostly appropriately split, with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |