Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, actionable skill body with excellent worked examples and a clear five-step workflow supported by well-signaled reference files. Its main weakness is redundancy — the Common Proof Patterns and Tips sections repeat earlier content — which hurts conciseness.
Suggestions
Merge 'Common Proof Patterns' into the workflow steps or move it into references/summarization_patterns.md to remove the duplication with Step 1–4.
Consolidate 'Quality Guidelines' and 'Tips' into a single short checklist to cut repeated guidance.
Add a brief validation checkpoint (e.g., 'verify the outline still proves the stated theorem') to lift workflow clarity toward the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the 'Common Proof Patterns' section largely restates the Step 1–4 templates and the 'Tips' section overlaps 'Quality Guidelines', so noticeable tightening is possible. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete worked examples (Isabelle induction, Coq case analysis, nested proof) shown as complete input→output pairs plus per-pattern templates with specific tactic indicators, covering the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced (identify structure → extract components → group → outline → add detail), but there are no validation/checkpoint steps; acceptable since summarization is non-destructive, so it sits just below the validation-heavy top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear section structure with two real one-level-deep references (summarization_patterns.md, tactic_interpretation.md) that are well-signaled with load conditions; minor gap is that pattern/quality detail could migrate into those references to slim the body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |