Manage GitHub issues, labels, project boards, sprint operations, and roadmap health for the Arize-ai/phoenix repository. Use when filing roadmap issues, triaging bugs, applying labels, running sprint close-out and rollover, auditing board hygiene, checking ticket-load balance across the team, keeping roadmap epics up to date, flagging epics that need planning, or querying issue/project state via the GitHub CLI.
75
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Reference for managing issues, labels, project boards, and sprint operations on
Arize-ai/phoenix using the gh CLI.
Arize-ai/phoenixThere are two project boards. Pick deliberately.
Day-to-day sprint operations mean board #42. Roadmap epics with dates live on #45.
| Task | See |
|---|---|
| Close out a sprint / roll slipped tickets | Sprint Operations |
| Check the board is up to date | Board Hygiene |
| Check nobody is starving or buried | Ticket Load Health |
| Run a standup — recent work and work in flight per person | Standup |
| Keep roadmap epics current / flag ones needing planning | Roadmap Health |
| File a roadmap epic | Roadmap Issues |
| Add an epic to the roadmap board (#45) | Putting the Epic on the Roadmap Board |
| Apply the right labels | Label Taxonomy |
| Set project fields by hand | Project Field Mechanics |
| Create a bug or feature request | Standard Issues |
Five bundled scripts under scripts/ back the tech-lead workflows. They read
the roster, the sprint calendar, and all field IDs live — nothing about a
person, sprint, or ticket is hardcoded.
cd .agents/skills/phoenix-github/scripts
# Sprint board (#42) — needs a snapshot first
./snapshot.sh board.json # ~60-90s, walks the whole board once
./health.py board.json # hygiene + load report (read-only)
./rollover.py board.json # sprint rollover plan (dry run by default)
./standup.py board.json # per-person did/doing report (read-only;
# snapshot optional but recommended)
# Roadmap board (#45) — small, fetches live
./roadmap.py # roadmap audit (dry run by default)For board #42, snapshot once and run every check off that file. The ProjectV2 API has no server-side field filter, so a full read is ~63 sequential pages. Re-taking the snapshot per check wastes minutes.
A snapshot is a read cache, not a source of truth for writes. Anything
closed or moved since it was taken still reads as open in the file, so
rollover.py --apply refuses to run against a snapshot older than 2 hours
(PHOENIX_SNAPSHOT_MAX_AGE_MIN; override with --stale-ok if you know the file
is still accurate). Re-snapshot before applying, and again afterwards.
Board #45 is ~75 items — one page — so roadmap.py just fetches it each run.
Every script that writes is dry-run by default and takes --apply.
Tunable via env vars: PHOENIX_MIN_TICKETS (3), PHOENIX_MAX_TICKETS (15),
PHOENIX_ROSTER_TEAM (oss-eng; comma-separated list of org teams),
PHOENIX_ROSTER_EXCLUDE (empty; comma-separated logins to omit from all
reporting), PHOENIX_ROSTER_INCLUDE (empty; comma-separated logins to add to
the roster regardless of team membership), PHOENIX_STANDUP_DAYS (2),
PHOENIX_PROJECT_NUMBER (42), PHOENIX_SNAPSHOT_MAX_AGE_MIN (120),
PHOENIX_ISSUE_LIMIT (5000). Team-wide values live in .claude/settings.json
(env block); personal overrides go in .claude/settings.local.json. Neither
is read by a plain shell — export them when running the scripts outside
Claude Code.
Sprints are 14 days, defined by the Sprint iteration field on board #42
(field ID PVTIF_lADOA5FfSM4AIM-TzgFYwU4 — stable). Individual iteration IDs
rotate every sprint, so always resolve them live; never hardcode one.
# Current and upcoming sprints
gh api graphql -F org=Arize-ai -F num=42 -f query='
query($org: String!, $num: Int!) {
organization(login: $org) { projectV2(number: $num) {
field(name: "Sprint") { ... on ProjectV2IterationField {
id configuration { iterations { id title startDate duration } } } } } } }'The current sprint is the iteration whose [startDate, startDate + duration)
window contains today.
New iterations cannot be created through the API. If no future sprint exists, add it on the Sprint field in the GitHub UI before rolling anything over. The scripts fail with a clear message rather than guessing.
Run at the end of each sprint. Any ticket still open and not Done rolls to the next sprint and gets a comment recording the slip.
./snapshot.sh board.json
./rollover.py board.json # 1. review the plan (changes nothing)
./rollover.py board.json --apply # 2. move them + commentSlip comment posted on each rolled ticket:
Slipped from **Sprint 11-21-33** → moved to **Sprint 11-21-34**.
Rolled over during sprint close-out.Useful flags:
| Flag | Effect |
|---|---|
| (none) | Dry run — prints the plan, changes nothing |
--apply | Perform the moves and post comments |
--stranded | Also sweep tickets left behind on already-completed sprints |
--only 123,456 | Restrict to specific issue numbers |
--no-comment | Move without commenting (use for bulk cleanup of old strays) |
--stale-ok | Apply from a snapshot older than the freshness limit |
"Stranded" means a sprint that has actually finished, taken from the board's own completed-iteration list. Work parked on a future iteration is deliberate planning and is never pulled backwards, no matter how many iterations exist.
Always review the dry run before --apply. Rolling a sprint comments on
every affected ticket, which notifies every assignee and watcher — it is loud
and not worth undoing by hand.
A ticket whose move succeeded but whose comment failed is reported separately: it is already in the next sprint, so re-running will not pick it up again.
For the --stranded sweep specifically, prefer --no-comment: those tickets
slipped many sprints ago and a fresh "slipped" notification on each is noise.
The board is only useful if it reflects reality. health.py checks six things:
| Check | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Open tickets tagged to a past sprint | Slipped but never rolled — invisible work |
| Status Done but issue still open | Either close the issue or correct the status |
| In progress with no assignee | Nobody actually owns it |
| Current-sprint tickets with no assignee | Committed to but unowned |
| Current-sprint tickets with no Status | Won't appear in any board column |
| Open repo issues not on the board | Work that exists but is untracked |
./health.py board.json --section hygieneFix stranded past-sprint tickets with ./rollover.py board.json --stranded.
Add missing issues to the board with the mutation in
Project Field Mechanics.
Goal: keep everyone fed at all times. Every person on the roster should be carrying between 3 and 15 tickets. Under 3 means they are about to run dry; over 15 means they are buried and the queue is not real.
Roster is the live membership of the PHOENIX_ROSTER_TEAM team(s) (default
@Arize-ai/oss-eng), so it self-updates as the teams change. Collaborators
who carry sprint work without belonging to a roster team are added by login via
PHOENIX_ROSTER_INCLUDE, and show in the roster label as +login. Prefer
adding someone to the org team when that is appropriate — the include list is a
standing override that does not self-update. Logins listed
in PHOENIX_ROSTER_EXCLUDE are dropped from the roster and filtered out of
snapshot assignee data at parse time, so they never appear in any report.
./health.py board.json --section loadTwo numbers are reported per person, and they answer different questions:
The report also flags sprint work assigned to people outside the roster team, which is informational rather than a problem.
| Signal | Action |
|---|---|
| Someone under 3 in-sprint | Pull ready tickets from Backlog into the sprint and assign |
| Someone over 15 in-sprint | Re-assign to a starving teammate, or push to next sprint |
| Large ownership debt (high total, low sprint) | Unassign the stale tail, or move it to Backlog |
| Unassigned current-sprint tickets | Assign to whoever is furthest under the minimum |
Assigning and moving to the backlog:
gh issue edit 14541 --repo Arize-ai/phoenix --add-assignee <login>
gh issue edit 14541 --repo Arize-ai/phoenix --remove-assignee <login>Prefer moving ready, well-scoped tickets to a starving teammate over inventing
new ones. Tickets labelled good-agent-issue are already scoped tightly enough
to hand off cleanly.
standup.py answers the two standup questions for every roster person:
./snapshot.sh board.json
./standup.py board.json # recommended: board statuses make "doing" real
./standup.py # defaults to board.json; if the file is
# missing, falls back to live-only mode| Flag | Effect |
|---|---|
--days N | Lookback window in days (default 2, PHOENIX_STANDUP_DAYS) |
--person X | Only this login; repeatable, accepts non-roster logins too |
--json | Machine-readable output |
Read-only — it never mutates the board or issues. When presenting the report, lead with people whose did is empty and whose doing is empty or stale: they are the ones a standup exists to catch.
Board #45 is the roadmap. The job is to keep every current epic honest about two things: how far along it is, and how well it is broken down.
./roadmap.py # audit, changes nothing
./roadmap.py --apply # write planning labels + backfill Status
./roadmap.py --section planning # one section only:
# progress | planning | freshness | fieldsAn epic is current when it has started (Start Date on or before today, or no Start Date) and is still open. Everything scheduled for a future quarter is out of scope — there is no point auditing the specificity of work nobody has begun.
Today that is ~14 of the 46 open epics; the rest are dated Q4 2026 and later.
Roadmap progress lives in the epic body checklist, not in the Status field
or GitHub sub-issues. Only a minority of epics use real sub-issues, so the audit
parses - [ ] / - [x] items out of the body and counts an item as a real
ticket when it references an issue (#1234 or a full issue URL). A bare number
under 1000 does not count — the repo passed that long ago, so Phase #2 is
prose, not a ticket.
An epic is flagged when it has no checklist at all, or when fewer than 50% of its remaining (unchecked) items are real tickets — meaning the work ahead is still loose bullets.
The ratio deliberately ignores completed items. Epics often record shipped work
as prose (- [x] OAuth audience scoping ...), and counting that history would
flag well-run epics as under-planned.
This matches how epics are meant to evolve: list new scope as generic bullets first, then promote them to real issues lazily as they get picked up. The flag fires when an epic is being worked but its remaining scope has not been promoted.
Flagged epics get the needs planning label:
# One-time setup; --apply creates it automatically if missing
gh label create "needs planning" --repo Arize-ai/phoenix \
--color FBCA04 --description "Roadmap epic lacks a broken-down plan"
# Find them later
gh issue list --repo Arize-ai/phoenix --label "needs planning" --state open--apply also removes the label from epics that have since been planned, so
it stays truthful in both directions.
To clear a flag, break the loose bullets into issues (the to-issues skill does
this) and link them back into the parent's checklist.
| Check | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Quiet | No body edit or comment on a current epic for over 60 days — either dead or unreported |
| Overdue | Past its Target Date and still open — re-date it or cut scope |
| Complete but open | Every checklist item ticked, issue still open — close it |
| Missing Status | Status is empty; the audit proposes a value (see below) |
| Status disagrees | Status contradicts the issue's real state |
| Missing dates | Open epic with no Start or Target Date |
| Missing Initiative | Current epic with no Initiative set (reported, never written) |
Status is inferred from the issue itself, and only ever written with --apply:
| Situation | Proposed Status |
|---|---|
| Issue closed | Done |
| Open, started | In Progress |
| Open, future Start Date | Todo |
Status is currently empty on most of board #45, so the first
--applywill propose a large backfill. Review the dry run before running it.
c/)Every issue should have at least one component label.
| Label | Area |
|---|---|
c/ui | Frontend / React UI |
c/server | FastAPI backend / server logic |
c/traces | Tracing, spans, OpenTelemetry ingestion |
c/evals | Evaluations framework |
c/datasets | Datasets CRUD and management |
c/experiments | Experiment runs and comparisons |
c/annotations | Human annotations and queues |
c/prompts | Prompt management and prompt SDK |
c/playground | LLM playground and provider support |
c/agents | In-browser or terminal AI agents for Phoenix (PXI) |
c/client | Python/TypeScript SDK and REST client |
c/cli | @arizeai/phoenix-cli |
c/api | REST API surface |
c/sessions | Sessions and session tracking |
c/otel | OpenTelemetry / OTel ingestion |
c/rbac | Role-based access control |
c/auth | Authentication |
c/infra | Infrastructure, jobs, storage connectors |
c/helm | Helm chart / Kubernetes deployment |
c/mcp | MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration |
c/integrations | Third-party framework integrations |
c/filters | Filter UI and filter logic |
c/metrics | Metrics and aggregations |
c/usability | Usability and UX papercuts |
c/dx | Developer experience |
| Label | Use |
|---|---|
priority: highest | Roadmap epics and critical P0 bugs |
priority: high | Important but not blocking |
priority: medium | Normal queue work |
priority: low | Nice-to-have |
size:XS, size:S, size:M, size:L, size:XL, size:XXL — rough effort.
Board #42 also has a numeric Points field (1, 2, 3, 5) which is the one the
sprint board sorts on; the labels are advisory.
| Label | Use |
|---|---|
roadmap | High-level roadmap epic |
bug | Something isn't working |
enhancement | New feature or improvement |
documentation | Docs-only change |
triage | Needs triage by the team |
blocked | Blocked on external dependency |
backlog | Acknowledged but not scheduled |
needs information | Awaiting info from the reporter |
needs attention | Needs a maintainer to look |
design | Needs design work before engineering |
onboarding | Related to new-user onboarding flows |
phoenix-cloud | Arize-hosted Phoenix (cloud) specific |
user request | Requested by a user |
good-agent-issue | Well-scoped enough for an AI agent to pick up |
agent-in-progress | An agent is currently working on this issue |
good first issue | Suitable for a new external contributor |
Roadmap issues are high-level epics representing product initiatives.
🗺️ [category] TitleThe 🗺️ prefix marks an epic. Sub-issues that roll up under an epic use the
same [category] bracket but drop the emoji (e.g. [agents] dataset tools).
Categories: ui/ux, agents, tools, tracing/traces, sessions,
evals, server-evals, sandboxes, annotations, prompts,
datasets/experiments, infrastructure, enterprise, sdk/connectors. A few
standalone epics use a product name instead of a bracket (e.g.
@arizeai/phoenix-cli, REST API).
Every roadmap epic gets roadmap + enhancement. Add priority: highest for
actively-prioritized epics, plus the relevant component label(s):
| Category | Component labels |
|---|---|
ui/ux | c/ui |
agents | c/agents |
tools | c/agents (often none beyond roadmap) |
tracing / traces | c/traces |
sessions | c/sessions, c/ui |
evals | c/evals (add c/playground when playground-related) |
server-evals / sandboxes | c/evals, c/server |
annotations | c/annotations |
prompts | c/prompts, c/playground |
datasets/experiments | c/datasets, c/experiments |
infrastructure | c/infra |
enterprise | c/rbac, c/auth |
sdk/connectors | c/client |
@arizeai/phoenix-cli | c/cli, c/dx |
REST API | c/api, c/server |
Epic bodies are bare checkbox lists of tickets — no prose, no rationale. List new scope as generic bullets first and promote them to detailed sub-issues lazily, as they get picked up.
Once an epic is current, Roadmap Health flags it if the remaining bullets have not been promoted to real issues.
<one-line description of the initiative>
## Spike
- [ ]
## Front End
- [ ]
## Back End
- [ ]
## Open Questions
-gh issue create \
--repo Arize-ai/phoenix \
--title "🗺️ [category] Title" \
--label "roadmap,priority: highest,c/ui" \
--body "$(cat <<'EOF'
Description of the initiative.
## Spike
- [ ]
## Front End
- [ ]
## Back End
- [ ]
## Open Questions
-
EOF
)"
gh issue createdoes not support--json. Capture the issue URL from stdout and extract the number withgrep -oE '[0-9]+$'.
An epic is not done being filed until it is on board #45 with dates. Until
then roadmap.py cannot see it, so it is never audited or flagged.
NODE_ID=$(gh api repos/Arize-ai/phoenix/issues/{number} --jq '.node_id')
ITEM_ID=$(gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($project: ID!, $content: ID!) {
addProjectV2ItemById(input: {projectId: $project, contentId: $content}) {
item { id }
}
}' \
-f project="PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AJaRo" \
-f content="$NODE_ID" \
--jq '.data.addProjectV2ItemById.item.id')Then set Start Date and Target Date on that $ITEM_ID with
Set a Date Field. Both are board-#45 field IDs and
only work with an item ID from board #45.
Field IDs below are stable. Iteration (sprint) IDs are not — resolve those live, see Sprint Operations.
| Field | ID |
|---|---|
| Project ID | PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AIM-T |
| Status | PVTSSF_lADOA5FfSM4AIM-TzgFJPQg |
| Sprint (iteration) | PVTIF_lADOA5FfSM4AIM-TzgFYwU4 |
| Points | PVTSSF_lADOA5FfSM4AIM-TzgHhukw |
| Priority (number) | PVTF_lADOA5FfSM4AIM-TzgNgl3g |
Status options (note the emoji and spacing are part of the name):
| Status | Option ID |
|---|---|
| Backlog | 71ea9c79 |
| 📘 Todo | f75ad846 |
| 👨💻 In progress | 47fc9ee4 |
| 🔍. Needs Review | 35410d8c |
| 👍 Approved | d85daefa |
| ✅ Done | 98236657 |
Points options: 1 5694a02d, 2 e50f7f7e, 3 268e6755, 5 4f52b74b
| Field | ID |
|---|---|
| Project ID | PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AJaRo |
| Start Date | PVTF_lADOA5FfSM4AJaRozgInoCI |
| Target Date | PVTF_lADOA5FfSM4AJaRozgInn58 |
| Status | PVTSSF_lADOA5FfSM4AJaRozgFw9n0 |
| Initiative | PVTSSF_lADOA5FfSM4AJaRozg-EB08 |
| Sub-issues progress | PVTF_lADOA5FfSM4AJaRozgXC5Zs |
Status options: Todo f75ad846, In Progress 47fc9ee4, Done 98236657
Initiative options: Agents b38eaffc, infrastructure fdb510cd,
enterprise 4b78ba6c. Currently unset on every item — roadmap.py reports it
for current epics but never writes it.
Pass the project ID of the board you mean: #42 for sprint work,
#45 for roadmap epics. The returned $ITEM_ID is scoped to that board —
using it against the other one fails.
NODE_ID=$(gh api repos/Arize-ai/phoenix/issues/{number} --jq '.node_id')
# Sprint board #42: PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AIM-T
# Roadmap board #45: PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AJaRo
ITEM_ID=$(gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($project: ID!, $content: ID!) {
addProjectV2ItemById(input: {projectId: $project, contentId: $content}) {
item { id }
}
}' \
-f project="PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AIM-T" \
-f content="$NODE_ID" \
--jq '.data.addProjectV2ItemById.item.id')gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($project: ID!, $item: ID!, $field: ID!, $iter: String!) {
updateProjectV2ItemFieldValue(input: {
projectId: $project, itemId: $item, fieldId: $field,
value: {iterationId: $iter}
}) { projectV2Item { id } }
}' \
-f project="PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AIM-T" \
-f item="$ITEM_ID" \
-f field="PVTIF_lADOA5FfSM4AIM-TzgFYwU4" \
-f iter="$ITERATION_ID"gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($project: ID!, $item: ID!, $field: ID!, $option: String!) {
updateProjectV2ItemFieldValue(input: {
projectId: $project, itemId: $item, fieldId: $field,
value: {singleSelectOptionId: $option}
}) { projectV2Item { id } }
}' \
-f project="PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AIM-T" \
-f item="$ITEM_ID" \
-f field="PVTSSF_lADOA5FfSM4AIM-TzgFJPQg" \
-f option="47fc9ee4"gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($project: ID!, $item: ID!, $field: ID!, $value: Date!) {
updateProjectV2ItemFieldValue(input: {
projectId: $project, itemId: $item, fieldId: $field,
value: {date: $value}
}) { projectV2Item { id } }
}' \
-f project="PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AJaRo" \
-f item="$ITEM_ID" \
-f field="PVTF_lADOA5FfSM4AJaRozgInoCI" \
-f value="2026-04-01"gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($project: ID!, $item: ID!) {
deleteProjectV2Item(input: {projectId: $project, itemId: $item}) {
deletedItemId
}
}' \
-f project="PVT_kwDOA5FfSM4AIM-T" \
-f item="$ITEM_ID"gh issue create \
--repo Arize-ai/phoenix \
--title "Short description of the bug" \
--label "bug,triage,c/traces" \
--body "..."gh issue create \
--repo Arize-ai/phoenix \
--title "Short description of the feature" \
--label "enhancement,c/ui" \
--body "..."The board and roadmap change constantly — query live rather than trusting a snapshot in this file.
# Open issues on the sprint board (fast; search-based)
gh issue list --repo Arize-ai/phoenix \
--search "project:Arize-ai/42 is:open" --limit 200 \
--json number,title,assignees
# All open roadmap epics
gh issue list --repo Arize-ai/phoenix --label roadmap --state open \
--limit 100 --json number,title --jq '.[] | "\(.number)\t\(.title)"'
# Roadmap epics currently flagged as needing planning
gh issue list --repo Arize-ai/phoenix --label "needs planning" --state open \
--json number,title --jq '.[] | "\(.number)\t\(.title)"'
# Roadmap epics for a component
gh issue list --repo Arize-ai/phoenix --label "roadmap,c/evals" --state open \
--json number,title --jq '.[] | "\(.number)\t\(.title)"'
# Unassigned, ready-to-pick-up work (feed a starving teammate from here)
gh issue list --repo Arize-ai/phoenix --state open \
--label good-agent-issue --search "no:assignee" --json number,titlegh issue list --search "project:Arize-ai/42 ..." is fast but cannot see
project field values (Sprint, Status, Points). Anything that depends on those
needs the full board snapshot — use scripts/snapshot.sh.
Epics group their child issues as a markdown checklist in the body (often
bucketed by Phoenix surface — Datasets, Prompts, Playground, Experiments,
Evals — with a ## ✅ Completed section). When filing a sub-issue, link it back
from the parent's checklist.
e127482
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.